A CALL FOR PARTICIPATION

The Connection is an open conversation, a group blog, and a nonpartisan effort to spark a rich discourse on fundamental values in health reform. Anyone can submit a post, and a selection of posts will appear here, on the Health Affairs blog, and in an upcoming volume.

SUBMIT A POST

10.8.09

Accountability: If You Can’t Measure It…

Sharon Bee Cheng | From Strategic Healthcare

Let’s get even more pragmatic about our values and talk about accountability.

It is a business truism that if you can’t measure it, you can’t manage it.  Our healthcare system is incredibly adept at measuring revenue, procedures performed, and patients moved out the door.  In our current system, physicians and facilities get tangible rewards for managing these measures efficiently.  However, research such as the Dartmouth Atlas illustrates that more of these things—payments, procedures, and patient throughput—aren’t yielding better health outcomes.

We need to focus on measuring quality and holding providers accountable for it.  We need to redefine efficiency as using our resources to get the best health outcomes.

As the largest payer in healthcare, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) has made substantial progress toward building accountability into the system.  Nearly all hospitals that provide services to Medicare patients report on quality measures such as steps to avoid infection, mortality rates for certain surgeries, and quality of patient experience.   However, there is still a long way to go towards accountability throughout healthcare. When CMS gave physicians an opportunity to report their use of good practices in caring for Medicare patients and offered a financial incentive for that reporting, the initial response rate was below twenty percent.  That level of accountability is not enough.

Health care reform must support the efforts underway at CMS and among private payers to measure the use of good practices, the rates of positive health outcomes such as diabetes or blood pressure under control, and the level of patient satisfaction with communication and controlling pain.  We must achieve a high level of measurement so that physicians and providers can manage their quality and be held accountable for it.  Only then can we get to the point where doing health care well is as rewarding as simply doing a lot of it.

value: Accountability, Efficiency, Pragmatism

COMMENTS (1)

Sharon,

Yes, measuring clinical outcomes sounds intuitively right. Still, I wonder if this is a case where inquiry is just as important as certainty. We think we know what determines health, and of course we should use best evidence to prescribe. But generally we don’t measure and act on non-clinical factors that are the primary determinants of health, because these are hidden by the current medical-model frame.

Accountability should begin with national recognition of the powerful role of social determinants of health. This must become central to the national dialogue (not just the health reform dialogue). We need to go beyond GDP with national health measures that bring these determinants to light, that allow us to continually see our progress and the impact of our policy and personal decisions.

The evidence is clear: where we live, work and play; our socioeconomic status; our sense of control, hope and belonging; and how we treat each other… these matter most to health. If we fail to see and act on this our health as a nation will not change.

Rick Brush
http://www.communitiesofhealth.org

 

The Connection is a forum for open – and civil – discourse. We reserve the right to remove any comments that violate the spirit of that conversation.