A CALL FOR PARTICIPATION

The Connection is an open conversation, a group blog, and a nonpartisan effort to spark a rich discourse on fundamental values in health reform. Anyone can submit a post, and a selection of posts will appear here, on the Health Affairs blog, and in an upcoming volume.

SUBMIT A POST

Posts on Justice


12.21.09

Improved Health Care for All: A Hospital Chaplain’s Perspective

Robert R. Morris

For the past 40+ years I have been a chaplain at varying times in a city hospital, a community mental health center, an academic medical center, a community not for profit hospital setting. I have seen patients from all places on the economic spectrum, gender, disease modalities, injuries, emotional difficulties and reactions and more. I have seen the staffs that work with these people – some of whom are bright, curious, well educated and highly motivated; and some who are simply putting in their hours of the job, dull in mind and spirit, and uncaring.

more

value: Justice, Stewardship | Comments (1)


11.16.09

Values on NPR’s Talk of the Nation Science Friday

| From NPR Science Friday

Tom Murray, president of The Hastings Center, discussed how and why health reform should reflect our values in an interview on NPR’s Science Friday.

more

value: Accountability, Efficiency, Fairness, Freedom, Health, Honesty, Integrity, Justice, Liberty, Medical Progress, Pragmatism, Privacy, Quality, Responsibility, Solidarity, Stewardship, Subsidiarity | Comments (1)


11.6.09

Justice and Fairness in Health Care: A Useful Direction

Paul Kelleher | From Paul Kelleher's Blog

In a previous post, I used Paul Menzel’s provocative contribution to the Hastings Center’s Values and Health Reform Connection as a touchstone for getting clearer on what implication the values of fairness and equality of opportunity might have for health care reform. Since that post was mostly critical in nature (I argued that they do not have the implication Menzel describes), I wanted to offer a constructive suggestion that, while not novel, might provide some reason to think that seemingly conflicting strands in contemporary political philosophy can provide mutually supportive grounds for a government guarantee of affordable access to adequate health insurance.

more

value: Fairness, Justice | Comments (0)


10.28.09

Justice and Fairness in Health Care: Comments on Menzel

Paul Kelleher | From Paul Kelleher's Blog

In “Justice and Fairness: Mandating Universal Participation,” Paul Menzel grounds his endorsement of government-assured universal access to basic health care in a ideal of “just sharing” between fellow citizens. At the same time, Menzel calls unfair the current arrangement that shifts the costs of unpaid emergency care provided to “those who cannot afford to pay” onto “patients who can pay, almost all of whom are insured.” According to the figures cited by Menzel, such cost-shifting raises average family premiums by roughly $1,000 per year, and amounts to “unfair free-riding.”

There is some dissonance between these two planks of Menzel’s overall view.

more

value: Fairness, Justice | Comments (1)


10.26.09

With Liberty And Justice: A Health Care System For All Americans

Deeana Jang, JD | From Asian American Health

As Americans, we value a health care system where people are treated fairly. We expect that if we work hard and pay our taxes, we’ll have access to that most basic human right — getting care when we need it. But for millions of people in this country who work hard and pay their fair share of taxes, that’s not the reality…

more

value: Fairness, Justice, Liberty | Comments (1)


Featured Posts

Freedom of Action: A Better Conversation

Let me start with Bruce Jennings’ fascinating opening essay on liberty. Given reform opponents’ frequent appeals to personal freedom both in specific cases–fears about government intrusion into end of life care, most notably–and in broader “the government is controlling your body” terms, establishing that health care reform is part and parcel of American ideals of freedom is absolutely essential, and so arguments like Jennings’ are absolutely critical to winning the debate…

more

10.7.09 | Comments (1)

value: Liberty

Stewardship: What Kind of Society Do We Want?

To exercise stewardship, or not—that is the question. Why put the point that way? Because one path leads to an abundant life, and the other is a dishonest, if elaborate, form of suicide.


Stewards distinguish themselves first by accepting responsibility, and then by acting on that responsibility to preserve, protect, and nurture something precious, through recurrent threats, for the purpose of delivering that precious thing to future generations.

more

9.30.09 | Comments (1)

value: Stewardship